A Red State-Blue State Controversy Affects ESG
The concept of 'woke' investing has emerged as a significant and contentious issue in today’s society, sparking debates that echo in various spheres, from Taylor Swift’s political leanings to the content of school libraries. This debate, with its far-reaching implications, has transcended its financial roots, evolving into a red-state-blue-state controversy that is now a defining feature of the American cultural landscape.
“Woke” investing, which focuses on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, has particularly inflamed Republican politicians. Many are pushing to ban ESG considerations from public investments. For instance, U.S. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) introduced legislation to exclude ESG from public investments. Schmitt's strong stance against 'woke' investing reflects the deep political tension surrounding this issue.
Schmitt’s “Stop Woke Investing Act” bill has garnered support from conservatives like Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform. Similarly, Florida Governor and former presidential candidate Ron DeSantis has backed legislation to end ESG practices in Florida’s investments, branding the state as one “where woke goes to die.”
Even within the investment community, there is a wide spectrum of opinions on ESG. For instance, billionaire investor Elon Musk has publicly criticized ESG, branding it a 'scam' used by 'social justice warriors.' This diversity of perspectives, which underscores the complexity of the 'woke' investing debate, ensures that all voices are heard, some seeing it as a positive social movement and others as a target for criticism.
ESG, as an extension of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) rooted in Faith-Based Investing (FBI), integrates Christian values into investment decisions. This includes considerations of Catholic Social Teaching (CST), Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), and Corporate Social Performance (CSP). However, it's important to note that the current research on CSR, SRI, and ESG often lacks a comprehensive understanding of ethical standards and quantitative methods in finance, highlighting the need for further education and research in this area to keep the audience well-informed.
The central question is whether ESG is a legitimate investment consideration being politicized or if it genuinely harms investing. The trend of Socially Responsible Investing and ESG has highlighted conflicts between shareholders and stakeholders. Freeman and Reed’s “third stakeholder theory” (1983) argued that corporations should also serve the needs of suppliers, consumers, employees, and communities, not just shareholders. This added responsibility can create a fiduciary conflict as corporate boards try to balance these demands, potentially distracting executives (Zhao, Yang, Wang & Michelson, 2021).
While the overall effects of ESG and “woke” investing are still debated, some analysts suggest the trend is overblown. Sheryl Rowling of Morningstar quoted Los Angeles Times business columnist Michael Hiltzik, who noted that the term “wokeness” is so vague it’s nearly meaningless, with interpretations ranging from embracing diversity to opposing white privilege.
Despite the controversy, investment firms like Fidelity Investments support ESG, claiming it helps identify valuable investment opportunities. James Surowiecki, in a January 2023 article for The Atlantic Monthly titled “The War on ‘Woke Capital’ Is Backfiring,” argued that Republicans view ESG funds as a “Trojan horse” for progressive ideologies. In response, red states have pulled public money from firms associated with ESG, like BlackRock and State Street. However, Surowiecki added that ESG investing is more of a label for business-as-usual practices rather than a significant shift toward “woke capitalism.” He also pointed out that the ESG trend has faced setbacks due to political backlash and perceptions of greenwashing, where companies deceptively present themselves as environmentally friendly.
For years, Wall Street has perpetuated the myth that socially, faith-based, or sustainable investing means sacrificing returns. However, Morningstar analyst Shannon Zimmerman reported in August 2015 that funds incorporating ESG often delivered risk-adjusted results comparable to or better than their peers.
As the nation approaches the November elections, debates over ESG and “woke” investing are likely to persist despite evidence suggesting that ESG does not negatively impact investment performance.
xxx
References:
Crifo, P., Forget, V. D., & Teyssier, S. (2017). CSR and SRI: Main voluntary approaches in responsible finance. In Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 81-102). Springer, Cham.
De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317.
Bhagat, S. (2022a, July 23). ESG: Three letters that won’t save the planet | Jul 23rd 2022. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/weeklyedition/2022-07-23
Editor. (2022b, September 29). The fundamental contradiction of ESG is being laid bare. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/09/29/the-fundamental-contradiction-of-esg-is-being-laid-bare
Editor. (2022c, October 1). All Talk, no Trousers - The fundamental contradiction of ESG is being laid bare. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/09/29/the-fundamental-contradiction-of-esg-is-being-laid-bare
Fox, T., Ward, H., & Howard, B. (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. World Bank.
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.
Groves, S., & LaRocca, R. N. (2011). An empirical study of Corporate Social Responsibility and stock market performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 507-533.
Hiltzik, M. (2023, February 22). Column: Right-wing culture warriors say wokeness is dead. They can’t even define it. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-02-22/column-right-wing-culture-warriors-say-wokeness-is-dead-they-cant-even-define-it
Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 805-824.
Rowling, S. (2023, May 9). Is there a problem with “woke” investing? Morningstar, Inc. https://www.morningstar.com/sustainable-investing/is-there-problem-with-woke-investing
Smith, N. C. (2020). Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A guide to best practice, business planning & the UK's leading companies. Routledge.
Surowiecki, J. (2024, February 7). The War on “Woke Capital” is backfiring. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/01/republicans-woke-capital-esg-investment/677294/
Zhao, J., Yang, J., Wang, S., & Michelson, G. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility hinder corporate innovation? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(6), 1630-1644.
Zimmerman, S. (2015). Why values-based investing might work: characteristics inherent in ESG could give investors an edge. Morningstar Inc., (August/September), 79–81.